Cristina Kirchner Has a Lot of Nerve
Exploring Argentina's Economic Rollercoaster: From the Precipitous Rise and Fall of LEDIVs to the Enduring Challenge of Stagflation
We’ve been growing a lot lately! If you haven’t yet, consider subscribing :)
Argentina's economic landscape is a veritable rollercoaster of fiscal crises and policy flip-flops, with the recent debacle surrounding LEDIVs serving as a stark reminder of this volatility. The LEDIVs, financial instruments introduced to aid companies in foreign currency liquidation, were abruptly canceled, symbolizing the instability of Argentina's financial policy. Initially envisioned to manage foreign exchange variations, the LEDIVs amassed a stock exceeding USD 5 billion, only to be discontinued, leaving a trail of uncertainty for businesses relying on them.
This unpredictability in financial instruments is just the tip of the iceberg. The nation's finances have deteriorated significantly, a situation worsened by Sergio Massa's 'Plan Platita'. Under this plan, the remunerated liabilities at the Central Bank of Argentina (BCRA) ballooned to an astonishing 25.727 trillion pesos, over three times the size of the monetary base and amounting to 14.3% of the GDP. This expansion, a staggering 3.68x increase since Massa's appointment, has intensified the fiscal deficit and propelled inflation to alarming heights. In Massa's tenure, inflation soared by 193%, with the food sector, crucial for the impoverished, rising by 208%, and public service rates increasing by 171%.
Also read my recent articles on Argentina’s situation:
Amid this turmoil, former President Cristina Kirchner's recent remarks on stagflation as a "social catastrophe" strike a chord of irony. It was under her government in 2011 that Argentina first tasted the bitter pill of stagflation, an economic stagnation combined with rampant inflation that the country has been grappling with for over a decade. Her criticism, although valid in highlighting the social impact of stagflation, overlooks the historical context of her administration's role in instigating this economic condition.
Today, Argentina's struggle isn't just against high inflation or economic stagnation; it's a fight against the fallout of a century of governmental mismanagement. The immediate goal transcends economic growth; it's about averting a humanitarian crisis. The public hopes for a swift resolution are dashed against the reality of deep-seated fiscal challenges.
In this scenario, stagflation, as daunting as it is, seems a lesser evil compared to the potential of a humanitarian disaster. The focus must be on stabilizing the economy and preventing a collapse that could lead to severe social and humanitarian consequences.
In sum, Argentina’s economic narrative is a complex blend of abrupt policy changes, like the short-lived LEDIVs, worsening financial conditions under current policies, and the lasting impact of past economic strategies. As the nation confronts these challenges, its immediate priority is to forestall a humanitarian crisis. Only then can it realistically set sights on economic growth and stability. The journey ahead is long and arduous, demanding a fundamental shift in economic management and a steadfast commitment to rectifying a century's worth of missteps.